<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jason Lisle&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonlisle.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonlisle.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Dr. Lisle by Stephen Peterson</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/about-lisle/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlisle.com/?page_id=2#comment-233</guid>
		<description>There is a great free program called &quot;Celestia&quot; that you might look into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great free program called &#8220;Celestia&#8221; that you might look into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the Origin of Articles by Stephen Peterson</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/2012/05/17/on-the-origin-of-articles/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonlisle.com/?p=97#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Very interesting perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the Origin of Articles by Doug Taylor</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/2012/05/17/on-the-origin-of-articles/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonlisle.com/?p=97#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Great Scott! First you move to ICR. Now you&#039;re combining apologetics with unbridled sarcasm. The mind reels with what may be coming next from the new Dr. Lisle!
Oh...and that really is a wonderful expose naturalism&#039;s absurdity.
Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Scott! First you move to ICR. Now you&#8217;re combining apologetics with unbridled sarcasm. The mind reels with what may be coming next from the new Dr. Lisle!<br />
Oh&#8230;and that really is a wonderful expose naturalism&#8217;s absurdity.<br />
Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on God’s Law: Established in Christ by Alberto Delgado</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/2012/02/03/gods-law-established-in-christ/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Delgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://braghost.com/~jplisle/?p=80#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Brother  Lisle , I found your blog and put in some input as you see  hope you don&#039;t mind !
God&#039;s use of the law
.  God gave more Laws to the Hebrews to get them ready for the Messiah. The Law was to be used as a mirror and to stir up the sin inside the Jews so they would know their need for Christ, and to take the Good News to the world. The written Law exposed sin Roman 7:13;  Galatians 3:22-29 the Law was their schoolmaster; Gal 3:17 And this I say, that the commandments, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the Law, which was 430 years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.The Jews were given more of the law because they needed to know more about their imperfection than the gentiles so now they will know their need for Christ and to show it to the world. The knowledge of the Law is like a police and a judge. The knowledge of law required by a judge is greater than that required of a policeman, yet it is still the same law. And, so it is with the Law that came in through Adam and Moses. It is the same Law but with different levels of knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brother  Lisle , I found your blog and put in some input as you see  hope you don&#8217;t mind !<br />
God&#8217;s use of the law<br />
.  God gave more Laws to the Hebrews to get them ready for the Messiah. The Law was to be used as a mirror and to stir up the sin inside the Jews so they would know their need for Christ, and to take the Good News to the world. The written Law exposed sin Roman 7:13;  Galatians 3:22-29 the Law was their schoolmaster; Gal 3:17 And this I say, that the commandments, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the Law, which was 430 years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.The Jews were given more of the law because they needed to know more about their imperfection than the gentiles so now they will know their need for Christ and to show it to the world. The knowledge of the Law is like a police and a judge. The knowledge of law required by a judge is greater than that required of a policeman, yet it is still the same law. And, so it is with the Law that came in through Adam and Moses. It is the same Law but with different levels of knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on God’s Law: Established in Christ by Alberto Delgado</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/2012/02/03/gods-law-established-in-christ/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Delgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://braghost.com/~jplisle/?p=80#comment-229</guid>
		<description>The Law 
The way I try to explain this is, Adam was created like a bride with two husbands to choose from. One was the tree of knowledge of good and evil (Law) which demanded Adam&#039;s perfection, the other choice was the Tree of Life, which also demanded perfection but the perfection it demanded was His own, this was Christ. All things were created through Christ, imperfect of themselves but perfect in Him. Perfection was imputed. The devil was cunning, while Christ was courting the Bride to be (Adam), the devil deceived Eve. Adam married the Law to save Eve. The Law demanded Adam&#039;s perfection and found none causing Adam&#039;s death. Imperfection/sin was found in Adam. The second Adam, Christ, came to rescue us from our first husband (the Law) by dying to that husband as a man, and now freeing us to marry unto Him. Thereby, we are now found perfect in Him, with no sin. Therefore, now while on this earth our sinless soul and spirit struggles with our sinful/weak flesh till our bodies are redeemed. Our identity now is one with Christ in God the Father, perfect as He is perfect.
Grace and Peace,
Albert
Ps. Sin is a breakage of the law were there is no law there is no sin !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Law<br />
The way I try to explain this is, Adam was created like a bride with two husbands to choose from. One was the tree of knowledge of good and evil (Law) which demanded Adam&#8217;s perfection, the other choice was the Tree of Life, which also demanded perfection but the perfection it demanded was His own, this was Christ. All things were created through Christ, imperfect of themselves but perfect in Him. Perfection was imputed. The devil was cunning, while Christ was courting the Bride to be (Adam), the devil deceived Eve. Adam married the Law to save Eve. The Law demanded Adam&#8217;s perfection and found none causing Adam&#8217;s death. Imperfection/sin was found in Adam. The second Adam, Christ, came to rescue us from our first husband (the Law) by dying to that husband as a man, and now freeing us to marry unto Him. Thereby, we are now found perfect in Him, with no sin. Therefore, now while on this earth our sinless soul and spirit struggles with our sinful/weak flesh till our bodies are redeemed. Our identity now is one with Christ in God the Father, perfect as He is perfect.<br />
Grace and Peace,<br />
Albert<br />
Ps. Sin is a breakage of the law were there is no law there is no sin !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on God’s Law: Established in Christ by Alberto Delgado</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/2012/02/03/gods-law-established-in-christ/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Delgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://braghost.com/~jplisle/?p=80#comment-228</guid>
		<description>The end of all law moral &amp; ceremonial

Rom 7:7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not  covet . ( moral Law #7 )

Rom 6:14  For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace. ( so when does sin have dominion over you ???)

Rom 7:6  But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter. ( is he talking about part of the law ??? )


2Co 3:7  But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:  (both moral &amp;  ceremonial came in the tablets )


Jas 2:10  For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all(. ( was the law split here???)


Tit 2:11  For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, 

Tit 2:12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; (so who is it that teaches us?? is it the law =condemnation?? or His grace??)


     
Rom 2:16  In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.   (not by the law = sin) (He took away law and sin with his blood= cannot be justifided or found guity  with a system that has been replaced ?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end of all law moral &amp; ceremonial</p>
<p>Rom 7:7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not  covet . ( moral Law #7 )</p>
<p>Rom 6:14  For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace. ( so when does sin have dominion over you ???)</p>
<p>Rom 7:6  But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter. ( is he talking about part of the law ??? )</p>
<p>2Co 3:7  But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:  (both moral &amp;  ceremonial came in the tablets )</p>
<p>Jas 2:10  For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all(. ( was the law split here???)</p>
<p>Tit 2:11  For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, </p>
<p>Tit 2:12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; (so who is it that teaches us?? is it the law =condemnation?? or His grace??)</p>
<p>Rom 2:16  In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.   (not by the law = sin) (He took away law and sin with his blood= cannot be justifided or found guity  with a system that has been replaced ?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Research at ICR by Dr. Ron Samec</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/2012/04/20/research-at-icr/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Ron Samec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 16:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonlisle.com/?p=88#comment-227</guid>
		<description>At present, there are several solutions to the light time problem by John Hartnett (1+), Russ Humphreys (2) and Jason Lisle. These are all my friends. I still prefer Russ&#039;s original white hole cosmology. I have added at few &quot;perks&quot; to this model in my stars and galaxies course to help complete the model. This includes the light time problem, redshifts (and so called &#039;blue shift problems&#039;), and the creation of the CBR. The model could address cosmic element abundances with nuclear physics computations. Acceleration is still an area of inquirey. 
Here at Bob Jones University, we offer a strong background and a heavy research emphasis for students wanting to go into Astronomy and Astrophysics. Please visit our facebook page for ongoing activities. www.facebook.com/#!/BJU.Physics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At present, there are several solutions to the light time problem by John Hartnett (1+), Russ Humphreys (2) and Jason Lisle. These are all my friends. I still prefer Russ&#8217;s original white hole cosmology. I have added at few &#8220;perks&#8221; to this model in my stars and galaxies course to help complete the model. This includes the light time problem, redshifts (and so called &#8216;blue shift problems&#8217;), and the creation of the CBR. The model could address cosmic element abundances with nuclear physics computations. Acceleration is still an area of inquirey.<br />
Here at Bob Jones University, we offer a strong background and a heavy research emphasis for students wanting to go into Astronomy and Astrophysics. Please visit our facebook page for ongoing activities. <a href="http://www.facebook.com/#" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/#</a>!/BJU.Physics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Dr. Lisle by Rick</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/about-lisle/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlisle.com/?page_id=2#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Dr. Lisle, I pray I have not chosen the wrong forum for this question--- I am searching for a program that I can use to feed my son&#039;s desire to know the Cosmos.  We visited Creation Museum and viewed your Created Cosmos and read your book, Taking Back Astronomy.  I found that Digistar Three and Four are a little pricey for our Home School budget even without the dome!  I looked at Starry Night Podium which fits.  Would you make a recommendation of this or have other suggestions?
Blessings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Lisle, I pray I have not chosen the wrong forum for this question&#8212; I am searching for a program that I can use to feed my son&#8217;s desire to know the Cosmos.  We visited Creation Museum and viewed your Created Cosmos and read your book, Taking Back Astronomy.  I found that Digistar Three and Four are a little pricey for our Home School budget even without the dome!  I looked at Starry Night Podium which fits.  Would you make a recommendation of this or have other suggestions?<br />
Blessings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Dr. Lisle by Ben</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/about-lisle/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 05:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlisle.com/?page_id=2#comment-224</guid>
		<description>I have a question regarding the nature of God. I heard an arguement that we as Christians can&#039;t even account for His nature. Why is the nature of God the way it is? Why is that nature of the nature of God the way it is? Why is that nature that causes the nature the nature of God the way it is? I&#039;m not sure if it makes sense but basically its seemingly an endless amount of natures of God. How can this be solved? God bless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question regarding the nature of God. I heard an arguement that we as Christians can&#8217;t even account for His nature. Why is the nature of God the way it is? Why is that nature of the nature of God the way it is? Why is that nature that causes the nature the nature of God the way it is? I&#8217;m not sure if it makes sense but basically its seemingly an endless amount of natures of God. How can this be solved? God bless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Research at ICR by Dr. Lisle</title>
		<link>http://jasonlisle.com/2012/04/20/research-at-icr/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Lisle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 00:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonlisle.com/?p=88#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Nick - that was an excellent reply.  Thanks for chiming in.  Jacob apparently hasn&#039;t read much on this issue or given it much thought, and you gave some great starting points for him to begin to study it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick &#8211; that was an excellent reply.  Thanks for chiming in.  Jacob apparently hasn&#8217;t read much on this issue or given it much thought, and you gave some great starting points for him to begin to study it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

